Tuesday, November 21, 2023
In the realm of conflict resolution, the age-old notion of taking sides has been reconsidered as a potentially detrimental approach. Whether in personal relationships or professional settings, the consequences of firmly aligning oneself with one party over another have been highlighted as a hindrance to effective problem-solving.
Experts in psychology and counseling emphasize the drawbacks of adopting a partisan stance during conflict resolution. According to insights from Psychology Today, this approach often leads to emotional investment, clouding objectivity, and impeding fairness in addressing issues. The repercussions of such an approach include a breakdown in communication and a compromised ability to perceive alternate perspectives, often thwarting the discovery of mutually beneficial solutions.
To counteract this, professionals suggest the implementation of the 50-50 rule. This rule, as advocated by Psychology Today, assigns equal responsibility to both parties involved in a conflict. By doing so, it shifts the focus from assigning blame to promoting shared accountability for finding resolutions that benefit all involved.
Additionally, the Harvard Business Review cautions against hastily rushing towards solutions without a comprehensive understanding of the problem at hand. This highlights the importance of discerning between relevant and irrelevant information, especially in complex situations. Failure to do so could result in faulty or inadequate resolutions.
When it comes to counseling, the ramifications of taking sides are particularly profound. Counselors must maintain neutrality to foster trust and respect between the conflicting parties. Psychology Today underscores the significance of understanding differing perspectives in conflict resolution, emphasizing that triangulation or favoring one person over another can significantly impair relationships.
Similarly, counseling a friend necessitates a delicate approach. Taking sides against an absent individual might exacerbate feelings of isolation and injustice. Instead, impartial listening and offering objective feedback based on a comprehensive understanding of both perspectives are advised. This approach ensures support without bias and enables individuals to make informed decisions without feeling coerced or unfairly influenced.
In essence, the shift from taking sides to adopting a neutral, balanced stance in conflict resolution and counseling endeavors stands as a pivotal step towards fostering constructive dialogue and reaching mutually agreeable solutions. The focus on shared responsibility, understanding diverse viewpoints, and offering objective guidance emerges as a cornerstone in navigating conflicts without compromising relationships or fairness.
Johnson, David W. (2019, June 5). The importance of taking the perspective of others. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/constructive-controversy/201906/the-importance-taking-the-perspective-others
Marczyk, Jesse. (2015, January 20). Somę thoughts on side-taking. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/pop-psych/201501/some-thoughts-side-taking
Markovitz, Daniel. (2020, November 27). How to avoid using to solutions when problem-solving. Harvard Business Review.
Razzetti, Gustavo. (2018, November 15). Want to resolve conflicts? Stop Blaming Others. Psychology Today.
Waite, Claudette. (2017, June 14). Triangulation: Playing one person against another. New Point of View Counseling. https://newpointofviewcounseling.com/triangulation-playing-one-person-another/
Monday, November 13, 2023
Question: Why giving advise to others may be damaging relationships and causing problems at work?
Theme: Many of us freely give counsel when it is not requested, without realizing that we are doing so or the potential harm that this may do. In this summary, I give Andrea Darcy 's top 5 ways in which advice-giving harms relationships.
Here are five instances in which it might be detrimental to offer someone unsolicited relationship guidance.
1. Advice is a sort of criticism rather than encouragement.
Although you may have good intentions when offering advise that isn't sought, doing so sends the message that you don't trust the other person to figure things out on their own.
2. Advising others prevents them from developing as individuals.
Unconsciously, we make assumptions about others when we offer advise. You're thinking they lack the wherewithal to look within themselves for solutions. This prevents the other person from taking the time to tune in to their own inner guidance system or from developing any such system at all. something they do have; in fact, we all do.
By preventing yourself from thinking about new ways to improve your knowledge, you are also stifling your own potential for growth.
3. A piece of advise that makes perfect sense to you may be completely off base for someone else.
Giving advice means believing that your viewpoint is correct and that your approach will be effective for everyone. However, your life experiences are singular and may be vastly different from the other person's.
Your friend's decision to leave her work due to her harsh boss may sound reasonable to you, but your ability to avoid and resolve conflicts may have been developed through years of experience. However, your buddy may benefit from the chance to remain in her current position in order to finally learn to advocate for herself and set clear limits with her coworkers.
4. Giving advice shuts down rather than opens up dialogue. It closes down communication.
It's possible that giving an unsolicited opinion will lead to a thought-provoking conversation on how your thoughts can better the other person's life. The other person may feel judgmental and defensive, and as a result, they may end the conversation or switch topics.
5. Fifth, suggestions tend to be egocentric and alienate others.
In reality, we rarely offer guidance because we genuinely want to see someone else succeed. To achieve this goal, we need practice active listening.
The truth is that most advice-givers only want to boost their own egos. We look for validation that our lives have meant anything by making us feel intelligent, strong, or helpful.
Or, even worse, we are using "offering advise" as a means of hurting the other person or expressing our wrath passively.
6. I'd like to add a sixth reason for not giving advice. If the advice doesn't work out, the person getting your advice can turn around and blame its failure on you. You lose your credibility and a friend.
In conclusion, even if you believe you give excellent advise (which can be useful if asked for! ), if it is unasked for, it may have the consequence of prompting the question, "What should I do instead of giving advice?"
So, what can you do that advising can't do? Here are some suggestions from Darcy.
1. Listen carefully to what the other person is saying without interjecting your own ideas or experiences.
2. Pose insightful queries. Questions beginning with "why?" might lead a person to dwell on the past, become lost in introspection, and feel judged. Questions like "why did you take a job you don't enjoy?" can come out as judgmental and prompt uncomfortable self-examination. Instead of asking "why," try asking "what" or "how": "What does your ideal job look like, and how can you locate such aspects existing in the job you have?" motivates one to think optimistically and look forward.
3. Give someone your whole attention and praise. In psychology, this word describes the practice of allowing another person to feel safe and accepted despite our disagreement with their decisions or behavior. One of the many benefits of unconditional positive regard is that it allows one to assume that the other person has strengths that one is simply unaware of.
4. Understand the difference between empathy and sympathy. Unasked-for counsel is frequently masked sympathy. "I feel sorry for you because you're at a terrible spot under where I myself am," is pity dressed up as sympathy. To empathize is to seek to understand another person's perspective and experiences without drawing comparisons to one's own. [Here's more on the difference between empathy and sympathy:]
Only offer specific suggestions when asked for your input. You can always count on being approached for advice when the timing is right. However, if you are approached for your viewpoint, frame it in terms of openness. Avoid making it seem like there is just one correct response by emphasizing that your own point of view is the only one being considered and then asking for feedback. It's possible that the responses you receive will be helpful.
Is there anything else you can think of that happens when you give counsel that isn't ideal?
Reference: Andrea M. Darcy. (2023, March 23). Giving Advice- Why it Could Be Ruining Your Relationships. Harley Therapy. https://www.harleytherapy.co.uk/counselling/giving-advice-in-relationships.htm
Sunday, November 12, 2023
Park Güell is one of Barcelon'a favorite tourist sites, but it is frequently hard to find tickets if you want them right away. The official website usually proclaims "tickets sold out for today." Only four hour hundred people are allowed into the park per half hour.
We bought tickets the day before we went from a travel agency. It was a little more expensive, but worth having the guided tour. Before seeing Sagrada Família, Melanie want to know something about Antoni Gaudí, the church's principal architect, who was also one of the architects of Park Güell.
"I left the park with a better appreciation for the work of Gaudí," she said. "It helped me understand Gaudí better." Although his work may seem strange because it is a combination of Gothic and Art Nouveau, she could see it in his major guiding themes of love of God, family, and nature.
Origins of Park Güell
Park Güell's construction in 1900 coincided with Barcelona's evolution into a thriving metropolis, driven by industry and boasting over half a million residents. The city had dismantled its walls almost 50 years prior, paving the way for the innovative Eixample, a project spearheaded by engineer Ildefons Cerdà. Cerdà's comprehensive analysis of Barcelona's growth challenges, influenced by technological advancements like the railway, led to the expansive Pla d’Eixample proposal, which increased the city's expanse tenfold. His forward-thinking approach aimed to create a more efficient, healthier, and fairer modern city.
Throughout the latter half of the 19th century, Barcelona underwent rapid expansion, with the Eixample area emerging as a prominent bourgeois hub. Simultaneously, development extended into the old manufacturing regions, characterized by a more industrial and populist nature.
The 1888 Universal Exhibition showcased Barcelona's vitality to Europe and the world, highlighting the city as the focal point of a resurging Catalan nation. This event fueled a quest for a new urban artistic expression, giving rise to the prominent Modernisme movement, notably embodied in the heart of the Eixample and exemplified in the distinctive architecture of Antoni Gaudí.
Modernisme and Catalan Culture
The Modernisme movement, akin to other movements like Sezession, Liberty, Jugendstil, or art nouveau elsewhere, differed in its ambition. It wasn't solely focused on aesthetic revitalization; it was a manifestation of Catalonia's yearning for modernization and cultural revival, fueled by Barcelona's dynamism. This broader ambition led Modernisme beyond architecture and visual arts, influencing language, literature, and music as well.
While art nouveau, in its various forms, aimed to establish an international architectural style reflecting the cosmopolitan culture of the fin de siècle, the Catalan movement aimed for a different goal: a fresh blend of tradition and the most revolutionary modern concepts.
In Catalonia, the cosmopolitan essence of art nouveau transformed into a broader aspiration for modernity, rooted in the ambition to propel the country forward while deeply embracing its cultural heritage.
Modernisme in Barcelona
From the 1860s, the development of the Eixample area in Barcelona provided architects with diverse opportunities for creative expression, contributing to the city acquiring one of the most extensive and varied architectural repertoires in Europe. The initial ventures into Modernisme emerged within this broad landscape of historicist and eclectic architecture towards the end of the century.
During the emergence of art nouveau in cities like Brussels and Glasgow, when historicist and eclectic architectural styles dominated Europe, Barcelona was embarking on a uniquely original path. Following the 1888 Exhibition, forward-thinking architects began to reintroduce traditional construction methods such as the Catalan vault and ancient artisanal styles while exploring the expressive capabilities of iron. Esteemed architects like Antoni Gaudí, Lluís Domènech i Montaner, and Josep Puig i Cadafalch launched their careers within this milieu.
As art nouveau gained recognition at the 1900 International Exhibition in Paris, emphasizing nature-inspired forms both structurally and ornamentally, Barcelona became an ideal environment for such ideas. A cluster of architects, including Enric Sagnier and Jeroni Granell i Manresa, incorporated naturalist elements, largely within the eclectic architectural sphere. In contrast, the prominent figures of Modernisme, like Domènech i Montaner and Gaudí, took a more profound approach to interpreting art nouveau, seeking a balance between modernity and tradition, resulting in their distinctive architectural styles.
Güell and Gaudí
The collaboration between entrepreneur Eusebi Güell and architect Antoni Gaudí commenced when Güell encountered a window exhibit designed by Gaudí for glove merchant Esteve Comella at the 1878 Universal Exhibition in Paris. In that same year, Güell engaged Gaudí to create furnishings for the pantheon chapel at the Palacio de Sobrellano in Comillas, a town along the Cantabrian coast, intended for his affluent father-in-law, Antonio López y López. The architect behind this impressive neo-gothic chapel was Joan Martorell i Montells, where Gaudí had previously worked in Martorell's studio.
Several years later, Martorell entrusted Gaudí with another project, further solidifying the partnership between the two architects. This time, it involved designing the porter's gatehouse and stables for Finca Güell (1883-1887), a property owned by the Barcelona businessman in Les Corts, situated to the west of Barcelona.
The creation of Park Güell
Martorell, a highly esteemed architect at that time and someone Gaudí always regarded as his mentor, wielded significant influence over Gaudí's future body of work.
In 1886, Eusebi Güell assigned Gaudí the task of constructing his new residence, the Palau Güell, situated on Nou de la Rambla street in the city's historic district. Subsequently, in 1895, Gaudí collaborated with Francesc Berenguer to build a winery in Garraf county. In 1898, he conceived the design for the church in Colònia Güell, which housed the workers from the substantial textile factory owned by the industrialist on the outskirts of Barcelona. Finally, in 1900, Gaudí received the commission to create Park Güell.
Güell possessed a unique understanding of the significance behind Gaudí's architectural vision. Their connection went beyond that of an artist and patron; it was a genuine tale of friendship. For a considerable period, the Güell family resided in the expansive family estate (now a school) situated on the land where the project was developed, while Gaudí himself lived in one of the two houses constructed there.
Even during the businessman's lifetime, the park held the distinction of being one of Barcelona's foremost tourist attractions. The expansive square within was frequently utilized for hosting Catalanist events, traditional Catalan sardana dancing, and various civic and social gatherings.
Source: Official Website for Park Güell, Photos by Melanie Fisher